Welcome
Welcome to <strong>reincarnationcafe</strong>.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>!

The flip side of being Will..

Exploring the many ways we discover clues to our past lives

The flip side of being Will..

Postby Sandra on Tue Jan 27, 2009 4:46 am

My latest play was introduced three weeks ago in a reading, and all sorts of problems came up.

First of all - I'm not exaggerating - It had half the audience very excited. They loved it! it was a first draft, but most of the actors and a number of the audience members talked about what they loved about it, how they could see the conflict and the magic in it, lots of great positive stuff. There were tears, excitement, and high energy - over a first draft.

Then there was the other section. Absolutely horrified. All playwrights.

In feedback: One of the directors in town asked me a dry, very academic question. I wasn't quite sure what he meant me to answer. I ended up telling him, I'm sorry, but I have no playwrighting education, I wasn't sure what he was looking for.

Basically he said what he was looking for I don't have. He said there was no plot, no conflict, nothing in the play that made it a play. it was just a boring lecture. I listened to him go off on me for five minutes. Then the artistic director, who had been suddenly having all sorts of conflicts with the schedule after I submitted the play for my reading, and tried to talk me out of doing it, acted like the entire night had been a complete disaster. I stand there looking at her thinking: what hot spot did I hit with this?

The play is Shakespeare's Eyes. It's about a playwright who is horrified to discover that an artist has re-written the writer's play, someone that the playwright does not know - or is there something that has been forgotten? Almost the entire play is the argument between the artist and the playwright (no conflict?). There is a lesson in it: it talks about Shakespeare and his love for William Herbert. But most of it is clear, some of it funny, and done right it's not boring. Was someone uncomfortable about this information? Was it that Will was bi? This is NOT news...but who'd be put off by it?

I know one person was - the reincarnation of William Herbert was in this audience, and squirming. No, he doesn't realize yet, I have actually tried to tell him and he won't hear it. The play deflated him terribly, a reaction I was sorry to see. But he won't tell me what was going on with him.

In the meantime - I get praised for a few days. Except by the artistic director, who finally gets around to telling me the play was just terrible.

That rotten smell from the state of Denmark, as Hamlet once pointed out, has been raised again.

Did I tell you that the artistic director didn't actually watch the play?

What lesson am I getting from all this?


That time and attitudes repeat themselves. It's the same flak I used to get as Will. In fact, the whole night was "deja vu all over again..." :roll:
If this be error, and upon me proved,
I never writ, nor no man ever loved.
User avatar
Sandra
Site Admin
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Atlanta

Re: The flip side of being Will..

Postby pjt on Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:59 pm

Sandra wrote:What lesson am I getting from all this?


That time and attitudes repeat themselves. It's the same flak I used to get as Will. In fact, the whole night was "deja vu all over again..." :roll:


I have another suggestion...

IMHO. If your play was merely a piece of crap, it would be more likely to inspire utter indifference. Strong reactions, even negative ones suggest to me at least, that your very likely onto something.

I was an art major. I was dissed again and again by members of the faculty. 30 years later, every single idea or concept I was dissed for doing has been a smash in a museum since that time. Creativity, originality and innovation are often threatening to people who lack them. For some reason, a lot of uncreative people think it's their task to prevent anything new from ever happening.

It's not a coincidence that the God Saturn, who ate his own children signifies conservatism, tradition and the established order.

I say Illegitimi non carborundum

Peter
User avatar
pjt
 
Posts: 276
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:16 am

Postby Sandra on Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:41 am

Thank you, Peter. Yes, I know I'm on to something. And I hope it will end up being put to good use.

You've got me wondering about your Victorian life again.... it's the art. Anything new on that time?
If this be error, and upon me proved,
I never writ, nor no man ever loved.
User avatar
Sandra
Site Admin
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Atlanta

Postby pjt on Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:19 am

Sandra wrote:Thank you, Peter. Yes, I know I'm on to something. And I hope it will end up being put to good use.

You've got me wondering about your Victorian life again.... it's the art. Anything new on that time?


I'm still kicking things around. I think a dear friend I had 15 years ago was Edward Carpenter. It's a little too Thomas Jeffersonish, but I'm quite drawn to Cardinal Manning and Cardinal Newman... I'm sure I was aware of both of them at least. I'm pretty congruent with Newman as far as I know. It's not easy to get personal impressions of either of them, their biographers tend to keep such a respectful distance that I don't get a good personal read on either. I'm predicting that Newman was quite a fan of the fine arts. His prose is like babble to me though. I could easily have been part of Newman's clique and the members are pretty obscure.

I've been too busy to thoroughly research the situation. I still suspect I was a bit later in the English day than either of them.

There is sort of a tell in the art. Even when I was in college, I preferred the English painters from Waterhouse and Rossetti to Alma-Tadema over the Impressionists.

I've had better luck with my Chinese lifetime. I concluded some stuff about Tibetian/Chinese relations that I then verified.

Thanks for asking, I'll be sure and let you know if I really have a breakthrough on it. I have the feeling that I'm still not quite looking in the right spot, I'm just getting warmer :-)

Peter
User avatar
pjt
 
Posts: 276
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:16 am

Postby Sandra on Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:27 am

Peter,

We need to find out sometime if we English painters preferred YOU, too! ;)
If this be error, and upon me proved,
I never writ, nor no man ever loved.
User avatar
Sandra
Site Admin
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Atlanta

Postby pjt on Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:57 am

for sure, we'll have to actually meet up when you get back to elizabethtown. btw, I'm putting up a clearer profile pic.

Peter
User avatar
pjt
 
Posts: 276
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:16 am


Return to Going Past - exploring past lives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron