Hi, Karen --
Ex-"Ozhika Rau" here (I'm aiming to retire all my scattered monikers that appear on the web and stick with one).
You touch upon some very difficult and heartfelt things here that, because I have experienced a similar reluctance and pain, I feel I should try to respond to.
In speaking, I have one difficulty that I have to get over, though, and that is in how I should feel about your having said, of famous past lives, "if you remember any." I don't have memories -- I have meanings, parallels, sensations, where I can say, "Oh, yes, that's what that is," but it's all just below the surface and a part of my psyche seems to want to keep it that way (or at least I'm too lazy to pursue otherwise!

). This isn't to say that I don't have certainty -- since devolved into "highly probable" since I'm well-out of the experiences related to it. But the fact remains that I'm outside the circle of what I believe you or others might consider valid experiences or "proof." (On the other hand, can anyone else say that they opened up to their knowledge via dreams, textual "proofs", conversations via the dictionary, and a spiritual & impossible-to-replicate unplugging of one's persona, all tied to a specific and obvious connection to a then-current, highly unusual astrological event?

Thought not!

. )
Because I feel myself outside the circle of what is considered good evidence (at least to one's self) and remain awed at the relative ease with which you and a few others in these forums uncover memories, my reluctance to speak actually begins right here. I have, however, spoken both here (especially as a member of the previous site), at a few other sites, and with only a few persons in face-to-face encounters about my belief.
The crux of my issue has been (and still is, but in a more targeted way) "Am I supposed to say anything?" or "What would be the point?" or "Do I have a message?" I love where your guides responded to perhaps similar queries on your part with the statement "You hurt because you are not telling people who you really are." After you related that statement, you mentioned how you don't think that it is just Alexander that you're hiding but your capacity for exercising the kind of power that he had. It seems likely to me that this is the fuller message of what your guides were telling you (though only you can really say). I see a disjunction in my own life between the ease with which I might tell someone of my belief and the relative difficulty of showing them in terms of action or creativity or sense-of-self that it
deserves to be so. Understanding this disjunction is what allows me, on the one hand, to accept "O Great One, Thou Art Messiah!"-style messages from the subconscious while also accepting near-perpetual moderating suggestions from the I Ching and elsewhere along the lines of "Shut your damn yap, fool!"
The point, for me at least, is that this was dumped into my lap as much as a spur as anything. I don't have a role to live up to so much as a life that can be made better or more refined by dealing with or integrating a role (or, more importantly, what I have FELT that role to be). In other words, speaking now in terms of you, what is it about having this knowledge that serves
you as opposed to you presumably serving others by sharing it? If we were Pure Christ come to enlighten the masses, then it would be a different story. What we have been given is a tool for ourselves, but it remains true that part of the use of that tool may involve sharing our knowledge, being comfortable with it in that sense. Being comfortable (and sane) with it may indeed be the whole lesson right there... and, perhaps, when it can happen, a lesson and encouragement to others.
As I mentioned, I've shared with a few face-to-face. The first person I shared with was there to receive me during my rather fun bouts with paranoia that occurred while I was drying up from my spiritual sauna (no drugs involved, I assure you!). She was a friend, it was easy, she saw my sincerity, and she integrated this into her understanding without it damaging our friendship. As to whether or not she believes me, I have politely refrained from asking, but I have found that, with her, and with me, it doesn't matter.
That last phrase, "It doesn't matter," has come up a lot in my experience, either explicity or because I have found it to be so, so much so that I now use it as a touchstone. Here's what I mean. I can go into a web forum and I can make what must seem the most outlandish suggestions or claims or offer near-proof-like statements seemingly crying out for comment or criticism or a request for explication and I get... nothing. There is this sort of bubble that develops that does not get penetrated... a hovering
against a desire to penetrate. I have seen several others who might waltz in and offer whatever it is that they are trying to pass off and they quite often get run out of town. Why not me? It is because of this that I see their indifference as something else, as a kind of tacit fear of crossing a line, which is something like assent but without a corresponding desire to accept (and with all that this could imply for them). I have learned to think of this as a win, but especially as a win in myself: it suggests that there is something more than just getting someone to believe. In other words, we're not playing the belief game like so many others -- we're playing the comfort game... which of course leads back to our own sense of comfort and where it comes from.
Besides the first person I shared this with face-to-face, there has been one other (it was this one who explicitly stated that it doesn't matter and won't matter to anybody) prior to my sharing it with some members of my family. Sharing it with family members was a trip, but I find that, again, in their case, it doesn't matter. The result of all this has been simply to get the pressure off, for it doesn't matter! It only mattered when it was locked up in my head and loaded up with the idea that it could have life-changing importance for myself or others
only if they believed. I no longer believe in this being the way. Instead, one should neither refrain from stating the facts as one knows them in cases where it would
add to the conversation nor go out of one's way to attempt to elicit belief. It's all about being who you are (not being who you are in the eyes of others) and being comfortable with yourself and having no expectations... and understanding that, beyond this, people will always choose their own comfort level. of what they're willing to see... and that's because discomfort, as a tool of spirit, is something that only the Few, the Proud, the Marines! should ever blatantly wield.
(P.S., You know, I really didn't feel like cleaning up my place this morning, so thanks for the opportunity to Zone-out!

And Sandra! I'll get Ozhika off these boards as soon as I copy some PMs. No sock-puppetry here!)